Bachelor of Science
in Civil Engineering Technology
College / School
College of Science and Technology
Department
Department of Engineering Technology
Program / Major / Certificate
Civil Engineering Technology
Assessment Coordinator(s)
Continuous Improvement Committee consisting of Dr. Mir Hayder (Chair of the
committee), Dr. Mohamad Mustafa (Department Chair and the Coordinator of the
CET program), Dr. Asad Yousuf (Coordinator of the EET program), Dr. Qian Chen
(Coordinator of the CST program), and Dr. Bryan Knakiewicz (CET program).
Has there been a change to the Assessment Coordinator(s) since the last
assessment plan?
No
Person(s) responsible for writing and/or submitting this report:
Mir Hayder
To achieve recognition by academia, students, industry, government and community
as one among the best committed to: providing high quality educational
foundation required for a competent and creative professional career in the
area of engineering and technology, and serving as a catalyst for industrial
and technological development at the local, regional, national, and global
level.
Has this
mission statement been revised since the last plan?
No
Graduates of the CET baccalaureate degree program will be able to:
1. Utilize principles, hardware, and software that are appropriate to produce drawings, reports, quantity estimates, and other documents related to civil engineering.
2. Conduct standardized field and laboratory tests related to civil engineering.
3. Utilize surveying methods appropriate for land measurement and/or construction layout.
4. Apply fundamental computational methods and elementary analytical techniques in sub-disciplines related to civil engineering.
5. Plan and prepare documents appropriate for design and construction.
6. Perform economic analyses and cost estimates related to design, construction, operations and maintenance of systems associated with civil engineering.
7. Select appropriate engineering materials and practices.
8. Perform standard analysis and design in at least three sub-disciplines related to civil engineering.
SSU Strategic Plan Goal |
PSLO |
Semester |
Professor |
Courses |
Assessment Artifacts and Instruments |
Target Levels |
Results and Analysis of Results |
Actions in Response to Results |
Academic Engagement and Achievement |
1. The students will be able to utilize principles, hardware, and software that are appropriate to produce drawings, reports, quantity estimates, and other documents related to civil engineering. |
Fall 2013 |
B. Knakiewicz |
ENGT 2201 Technical Writing |
Research Paper Score |
At least 60% of students will score 60% |
TARGET MET 89% |
OVERALL: TARGET MET |
Academic Engagement and Achievement |
2. The students will be able to conduct standardized field and laboratory tests related to civil engineering. |
Fall 2013 |
H. Taylor |
ENGT 3601 Strength of Materials |
Quiz and Exam Scores |
At least 60% of students will score 60% |
TARGET 1 MET 80% |
OVERALL: TARGET MET |
B. Knakiewicz |
CIVT 4101K Steel Design |
Assignment and Test Scores |
TARGET 2 MET 73% |
|||||
Academic Engagement and Achievement |
3. The students will be able to utilize surveying methods appropriate for land measurement and/or construction layout. |
Fall 2013 |
B. Knakiewicz |
CIVT 4101K Steel Design |
Assignment and Test Scores |
At least 60% of students will score 60% |
TARGET MET 73% |
OVERALL: TARGET MET |
Academic Engagement and Achievement |
4. The students will be able to apply fundamental computational methods and elementary analytical techniques in sub-disciplines related to civil engineering. |
Fall 2013 |
J. Kuppuswamy |
CIVT 3311 Engineering Hydrology |
Tutorial and Test Scores |
At least 60% of students will score 60% |
TARGET MET 65% |
OVERALL: TARGET MET |
Academic Engagement and Achievement |
5. The students will be able to plan and prepare documents appropriate for design and construction. |
Fall 2013 |
B. Knakiewicz |
CIVT 4101K Steel Design |
Assignment and Test Scores |
At least 60% of students will score 60% |
TARGET MET 73% |
OVERALL: TARGET MET |
Academic Engagement and Achievement |
6. The students will be able to perform economic analyses and cost estimates related to design, construction, operations and maintenance of systems associated with civil engineering. |
Fall 2013 |
M. Hayder |
ENGT 3701K Engineering Economy |
HW and Exam Scores |
At least 60% of students will score 60% |
TARGET MET 67% |
OVERALL: TARGET MET |
Academic Engagement and Achievement |
7. The students will be able to select appropriate engineering materials and practices. |
Fall 2013 |
H. Taylor |
ENGT 3601 Strength of Materials |
Quiz and Exam Scores |
At least 50% of students will score 60% |
TARGET MET 80% |
OVERALL: TARGET MET |
Academic Engagement and Achievement |
8. The students will be able to perform standard analysis and design in at least three sub-disciplines related to civil engineering. |
Fall 2013 |
B. Knakiewicz |
CIVT 4101K Steel Design |
Assignment and Test Scores |
At least 60% of students will score 60% |
TARGET MET 73% |
OVERALL: TARGET MET |
SSU Strategic Plan Goal |
PO Goal |
Enabling Strategies |
Measures |
Targets |
Results and Analysis of Results |
Actions in Response to Results |
Academic Engagement and Achievement |
Increase enrollment |
a. Distribute flyers/pamphlets and promote the program in Open Campus Day activities. b. Write grants to attract students to Engineering Technology programs |
i. Banner data ii. Educational grants |
i. Average 120 students over a three-year cycle (Blackboard Analytics Data) ii. At least one educational grant |
TARGET PARTIALLY MET Student average will be analyzed during the last year of the cycle, (2015-2016) to see if target was met. Several grants available to students to attract them to the Engineering Technology Programs: PSLSAMP NOYCE MAGEC-STEM PLUS |
OVERALL: TARGET PARTIALLY MET Description of the expected use of results that will be addressed in the 2014-2015 academic year: Grants will be continued.
|
Academic Engagement and Achievement |
Increase faculty development |
Provide travel funds Provide institutional mini-grants |
a. Number of faculty presenting/ attending professional conferences b. Membership in professional organizations c. Number of faculty writing grants |
i. At least 2-presentations ii. Member of 2-professional organizations iii. At least 2-faculty are involved in writing internal and external grants |
TARGET MET Average Professional presentations is more than 3
Members of ASCE, IEEE, ASME, and ASEE
6-faculty are involved in writing external grants and more than 6 are involved in writing mini-grants |
OVERALL: TARGET MET Description of the expected use of results that will be addressed in the 2014-2015 academic year: Target met. Strategies will be continued within the program.
|
Academic Engagement and Achievement |
Maintain currency according to industry needs |
a. Alumni survey b. Employer satisfaction survey c. Industrial Advisory Board (IAB) meeting |
i. Alumni survey results ii. Employer survey results iii. Industrial Advisory Board meeting minutes |
i. 80% Yes to question 4 ii. 80% Above average (score 4 out of 5) to question 3 iii. 100% Relevancy |
TARGET MET
Result from employer survey: 100% Above average to question 3
100% IAB Relevancy |
OVERALL: TARGET MET Description of the expected use of results that will be addressed in the 2014-2015 academic year: Target met. Strategies will be continued within the program. |